On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 19:27, Armin Schindler wrote: > On Mon, 30 May 2005, Mike Price wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 18:21, Armin Schindler wrote: > > > On Mon, 30 May 2005, Mike Price wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 23:21, Armin Schindler wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 26 May 2005, Mike Price wrote: > > > > > > Yes libcapi is installed. Here is a sample of the errors I am > > > > > > getting: > > > > > > > > > > > > In file included from chan_capi.c:38: > > > > > > chan_capi_pvt.h:92: syntax error before "_cword" > > > > > > chan_capi_pvt.h:92: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union > > > > > > chan_capi_pvt.h:195: syntax error before '}' token > > > > > > chan_capi.c:41: syntax error before "ast_capi_MessageNumber" > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > It looks like _cword is not defined. The definition is made in > > > > > /usr/include/capiutils.h, do you have this file (should be installed > > > > > by > > > > > the libcapi/capi20 package) ? > > > > > On what system do you compiling (SuSE, Debian, ... or even Cross) ? > > > > > > > > > OK. I found I was missing isdn4k-utils-devel-3.1-76 and therefore > > > > capiutils.h etc. > > > > > > > > Now when I try to complie I get: > > > > > > > > chan_capi.c:114: variable `capi_tech' has initializer but incomplete > > > > type > > > > chan_capi.c:115: unknown field `type' specified in initializer > > > > chan_capi.c:115: warning: excess elements in struct initializer > > > > chan_capi.c:115: warning: (near initialization for `capi_tech') > > > > .... > > > > > > > > So things are still not quite right. > > > > > > > > The system is [EMAIL PROTECTED] v1.0 (CentOS 3.4 final) > > > > > > > > Any other pointers? > > > > > > It seems the setting in the Makefile of chan_capi about using CVS_HEAD is > > > not correct. I don't know which version [EMAIL PROTECTED] v1.0 is using, > > > but try > > > to change that setting. > > > Anyway, the CVS_HEAD/UNSTABLE_CVS defines in chan_capi is not really > > > good. I > > > changed that to have a small configure script, which makes the correct > > > settings depending the Asterisk version it is compiled against. I will > > > soon > > > release my version of a reworked chan_capi. > > > > > I have changed the setting but now get different errors: > > > > gcc -pipe -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -g > > -I/usr/include -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -O6 -march=i586 -DCAPI_ES > > -DCAPI_GAIN -DCAPI_SYNC -DCVS_HEAD -Wno-missing-prototypes > > -Wno-missing-declarations -DCRYPTO -c -o chan_capi.o chan_capi.c > > chan_capi.c:69: > > `__use_AST_MUTEX_DEFINE_STATIC_rather_than_AST_MUTEX_INITIALIZER__' > > undeclared here (not in a function) > > chan_capi.c:70: > > `__use_AST_MUTEX_DEFINE_STATIC_rather_than_AST_MUTEX_INITIALIZER__' > > undeclared here (not in a function) > > chan_capi.c:71: > > `__use_AST_MUTEX_DEFINE_STATIC_rather_than_AST_MUTEX_INITIALIZER__' > > undeclared here (not in a function) > > chan_capi.c:72: > > `__use_AST_MUTEX_DEFINE_STATIC_rather_than_AST_MUTEX_INITIALIZER__' > > undeclared here (not in a function) > > chan_capi.c:73: > > `__use_AST_MUTEX_DEFINE_STATIC_rather_than_AST_MUTEX_INITIALIZER__' > > undeclared here (not in a function) > > chan_capi.c:74: > > `__use_AST_MUTEX_DEFINE_STATIC_rather_than_AST_MUTEX_INITIALIZER__' > > undeclared here (not in a function) > > chan_capi.c:75: > > `__use_AST_MUTEX_DEFINE_STATIC_rather_than_AST_MUTEX_INITIALIZER__' > > undeclared here (not in a function) > > chan_capi.c:114: variable `capi_tech' has initializer but incomplete > > type > > chan_capi.c:115: unknown field `type' specified in initializer > > chan_capi.c:115: warning: excess elements in struct initializer > > > > The version of Asterisk appears to be 1.0.7. > > Did you apply some patch to chan_capi? > That's what I meant with the 'CVS_HEAD setting is not good', because some > changes were made between some releases and the chan_capi Makefile just > knows 'old' and 'new' which is not working for some versions. > Anyway 1.0.7 should work with unpatched chan_capi 0.3.5.
Thanks. I have now re-installed the unpatched chan_capi and have successfully compiled it. Now its on to try to get it to work. Thanks again > > > When do you expect to have your reworked chan_capi ? > > I still want to fix some race-conditions. It should be ready for 'testing' > end of this week. > Let me know so I can give it a go. Mike > Armin > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
