On Monday 30 May 2005 03:38, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > 334,147,0 and 334,146,0 are practically the same. As for 334,0,0: > Maybethe second patter was missed? I have the same problem here.
Yeah I was thinking the same thing; Does the distinctive ring code have any kind of filtering (say round each part of the cadence to the nearest 250ms)? -A. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
