On Monday 06 June 2005 13:29, William Waites wrote: > So this is a version of Asterisk that is released by Digium but > is not released under the GPL. Correct?
Not quite. This is a specific set of CVS with NO NEW FEATURES that is not released under GPL. There is nothing in ABE that is not also in HEAD. All ABE is is a specific snapshot that they maintain independently. You just don't get to know exactly what the binary doesn't have. > If it were released under the GPL, the source code would be > available. Correct? Asterisk is dual-licensed. Always has been. > So Digium has leveraged the community to build for them a > proprietary product. Correct? > > Nice. Others have commented on this, so I'll refrain short of saying you need some serious clue. I'm not sure I see your name in any of the CVS commit logs, so other than whinging on about it, what really do you have to say? -A. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
