The guy named himself after a keyboard (his pen name) and I have not finished one of his articles in a while.
He is selling advertising though shock articles. Here is another gem. http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:qtQlMzEk9AYJ:linux.slashdot.org/article.pl%3Fsid%3D05/02/25/162243%26tid%3D109%26tid%3D106+dvorak+site:slashdot.org&hl=en I think you can safely discard this one too. Dan On 6/6/05, Colin Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1812887,00.asp > > Specifically, his assertion that ISP's would sniff traffic and block, say, > the SIP port. You could play wack-a-mole with port numbers, no? > > Also a community based, Freenet style of encryption implementation for > "free" VoIP traffic would address this issue. > > I raise this to the list because I'm sure there's a grain of truth in what > he's saying. ILEC's would be crazy to not consider this kind of lock in, > since it's pretty obvious that packet voice networks are going to supplant > circuit networks completely in, say, 20 years. Maybe sooner. > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
