On Friday 10 June 2005 07:34, Terry H. Gilsenan wrote: > Your server your rules, however in this day of increasing trojan SMTP > engined boxes, you should expect to get les and less deliverability.
I fail to see how a reverse pointer that == forward record means a more reliable message. How many SMTP servers are compromised? I far prefer smarter methods, especially in days where people are putting as many services as possible on one IP and want a reverse record that makes some kind of sense. :-) > The point I was making is that the MTA was using a faked name in the HELO. > That is an immediate red flag to a well configured MX. Oh absolutely and, as I said, I do the same thing. Actually my front-line postfix rules reject a lot of mail before it ever hits the real spam/virus filters. -A. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
