Actually, Intel have no right to ake any claims about what you can do
with that code. They are neither the copyright holder, nor the patent
holder. If you look at the code it is just the ITU reference code
modified to take advantage of Intel's IPP library.
Steve
stevanus wrote:
Hi,
As far as I remember, Intel sources state that noone has to spend
anything on their kind of implementation of G729, if he or she doesn't
get any benefit from it at all (i.e: non-commercial use).
Personally, I agree for this kind of practice as this will speed
education rate for people who cannot afford it. [In my country, there
are still many IT professionals that is paid under $200 per month :( ]
Best regards,
Stevanus
Zoa wrote:
Im saying that the code is only an implementation of g729.
The intel sources clearly states that you need a license for g729, not
from intel but from the g729 patent holder.
Zoa.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
