Hello All ,
RFC = Request For Comments .
STD = Standards Track Document(s) .
Hth , JimL
On Sat, 11 Jun 2005, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On Saturday 11 June 2005 11:35, Tracy Phillips wrote:
That is *precisely* why the RFC is worded "should" -- it is optional. If
the RFC said "must" then it is required. RFCs are worded very carefully
as a general rule.
I am just glad everyone doesn't have that attitude about RFCs.
I'm not sure I understand -- I'm not making this up, RFCs use "must" and
"should" very carefully. The latter is a guideline, and the former is a
rule. I'm trying to find the link describing this but it's eluding me at the
moment.
I think this is a VERY good thing; RFCs are like the laws of the internet;
they should not be open to interpretation since they define the protocols
used to interoperate.
-A.
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
| James W. Laferriere | System Techniques | Give me VMS |
| Network Engineer | 3542 Broken Yoke Dr. | Give me Linux |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Billings , MT. 59105 | only on AXP |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
