On Sat, 2005-06-11 at 18:04 -0400, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: > On Saturday 11 June 2005 16:21, trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com wrote: > > The GPL does not extend to the hardware or software that Asterisk > > talks to. For example, if you are using a SIP soft phone as a client for > > Asterisk, it is not a requirement that that program also be distributed > > under GPL. Additionally, AGI applications, which are simply > > launched by Asterisk and communicate > > No, but there was some talk about exactly what "linking" refers to. If you > develop a 3rd party .so that asterisk loads, it does fall under the GPL; you > can't make a wowie-gee CDR or call routing module and license it any way you > please. Mark was at one point condidering the pros and cons of doing the > same for the manager interface, but I haven't heard anything concrete since.
Really. So if I use a non GPL libc I cant run asterisk? Interesting that its so parasitic that you will either be assimilated or not. I however dont think that is the case. Modules, yes they are considered derritave works (my opinion is that they arent but that is the wording on gnu.org), libraries can go either way. There are ways to curtail this behaviour if desired and make it so you can only link against GPL code, but then things like the manager interface cant be controlled that way. If that were the case they could say you cna only use GPL sip clients and they cant (and specifically dont) say that. -- Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com Bret McDanel UK +44 870 340 4605 Germany +49 801 777 555 3402 US +1 360 207 0479 or +1 516 687 5200 FreeWorldDialup: 635378
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
