> I don't think so. It appears to be a front-end compiler that reads the > new AEL syntax and compiles it into the existing internal dialplan > representation (but I could be wrong, I haven't studied the fine detail).
That sounds like what Mark said the goal of AEL was. It is just another way to declare the same intensions in a dialplan with no runtime penalty, but using a language that is a little more structured (meaning it looks like c). The resulting dialplan is stored exactly the same way. Quoting JerJer, "it's another way to write spaghetti coede that no one else will be able to understand." I think they're both right :) _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
