Maybe they considered the matter closed after their previous decision [1] denying Microcell access to LNP in '99? It's funny though that addressing the possibility requires a 3 year work plan[2] for what is more or less the equivalent of a DNS lookup.
re, spd [1] http://www.crtc.gc.ca/archive/eng/Decisions/1999/DT99-12.htm [2] http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/INFO_SHT/t1021.htm On Apr 5, 2005 11:04 AM, Michael Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Speaking of CRTC... it seems that they will be reviewing the local > number portability for wireless operators this year. > > I don't understand why the CRTC takes so long to do anything, > particularly after the situation is well and resolved in the US. > > - -- > ] Michael Richardson Xelerance Corporation, Ottawa, ON | firewalls > [ > ] mcr @ xelerance.com Now doing IPsec training, see |net > architect[ > ] http://www.sandelman.ca/mcr/ www.xelerance.com/training/ |device > driver[ > ] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); > [ > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Finger me for keys > > iQCVAwUBQlKo+YqHRg3pndX9AQH0tgP/d0ov16abNCZ82apVC1VyFSstSFB02JV2 > 59vMGGwFSMWuHwbo0Ov5DxhUFs+FMXqbR/SsaruJPrPxcwLFEjHVqtqFWtrwcOGi > DJM+lyJPVbAedGQqdsR9MZ9W+Hv6JYsdeVOZacnaIEZ72PBVYjCKEdFrUBOJEP+G > wb+OZTK/7BQ= > =jFiK > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
