I have to say that I'm grateful for [EMAIL PROTECTED]  I wouldn't have
had the time to try out so many different things if it hadn't come
together in a nearly ready state.  Personally I'm not a linux guru so
it's nice to not have to take hours learning how to install Apache and
configure it just to take a look at Flash Operator Panel, for
instance.

Having said that, I have had my share of seemingly random grief moving
from one version to another.  My @home box is just a toybox, my
everyday system is a box that I built from scratch.  As Simon
suggests, it's a little easier to trust something when you put it
together yourself.  I'm torn though, my main box is way behind on
several components and I've considered just dropping the @home CD in
to save lots of time and get the benefit of features that I wouldn't
otherwise have taken the time to install.

Peter:  I'm interested in the problem you're having.  Do you mean that
you can't dial any zap phones or use any zap trunks?   What sort of
error do you get?  Maybe I can replicate the situation over here. 
What sort of hardware are you using.

Dave

On 1/16/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think we're better off using [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.1 for now. I don't think 
> 2.2 is
> an official release.  It hasn't shown up on the main site yet for a
> while now.  When I went to test the dialparties.agi PERL script, I
> found that the PERL install was messed up.  The yum update just
> made things worse so I went back to 2.1.  After patching for an extra
> "-" in the SMP kernel source, I finally have it mostly working but the
> ZAP line is not available.  If anyone knows the way to get the "zap"
> command back, it would be appreciated.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] sure packs a lot in, but that seems to mean there is lots to
> go wrong. Comments anyone?
>

Reply via email to