Alex, Thanks for the summary -
Maybe I'm missing something, but one of the major problems I still see for this project is the lack of any (visible) form of bug tracking - there are a number of existing issues with the 1.0 release, but so far I have not been able to find a concise list of these issues. Trolling through the forums isn't suitable. There is an update available for the 1.0 release, but it has no mention of what is fixed or what it contains - Unfortunately, I find this very similar to the previous [EMAIL PROTECTED] project, where releases were just provided with no indication of changes. I am aware that TrixBox is comprised of a number of other projects, so bug tracking could be a challenge when the bug lies with one of these projects, but other distributions manage it, so why not TrixBox? Hopefully, because the project is still in it's infancy, these things will eventually be provided. Just my 0.02. Martin On Tuesday 06 June 2006 04:51, Alex Robar wrote: > Martin, > > You're quite right about everything you've said here. The moniker "home" > caused statements like, "We're a _business_, we need a _business_ class > PBX". While I'm not sure that Trixbox is a better name for it, I do feel > it's a step up from tacking on "@home". > > In addition to changing the name, there are now several people > developing and testing Trixbox (as opposed to when it was just Andrew > Gillis developing [EMAIL PROTECTED]). This makes for a generally more well > tested product. > > The upgrade path hasn't had the opportunity to be tested yet, but it > _is_ there, which is the important part. There is now a dedicated > Trixbox RPM repository which grabs the latest versions of the Trixbox > core RPMs when you run a script bundled with the product. > > HUDLite is a first attempt at a free product by Fonality. Up until now, > Fonality has focused on their own distribution of Asterisk that included > their HUDPro server software, and one could manage their extensions > using HUDPro client software. It is very much like an upgraded version > of FOP, with a great set of features included (you can instant message > other operators who are online, start recording a call on any given > extension with the push of a button, dial a call from the interface, > etc). > > Having said all those things, I've tested Trixbox, and my recommendation > right now is to WAIT for the next version. Especially if you have Zaptel > devices. There have been some serious headaches with zap hardware, in > addition several other major show stoppers (voicemail occasionally stops > after 10 seconds or so, and just hangs up on the caller). > > All in all, good ideas... But wait for 1.1 for the bugs to be fixed. > > Alex > > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Glazer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 2:33 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [on-asterisk] [EMAIL PROTECTED] = TrixBox > > This is how I understand things. > > There were a number of issues with [EMAIL PROTECTED] (AAH)- the major ones > being the name and upgradeability (or lack thereof). > TrixBox is basically still the same as AAH (same author, same > components), but with the major difference being that there is now an > upgrade path. The various components have been packaged into RPMs for > distribution. > So far it is still free. > > HUDpro (HUDlite bundled with TrixBox) is basically a much more > sophisticated version of the Flash Operators Panel (FOP) and is > commercial software written by Fonality to work with their Asterisk > distribution called PBXtra - based on Asterisk 1.0. > HUDlite is the "free" version, with a limited set of features - > http://www.hudlite.org/modules/smartsection/item.php?itemid=8 > Supposedly HUDlite can run on generic versions of Asterisk, but I > haven't been able to test this yet. > > At the moment I don't believe you can even purchase HUDpro to work with > generic versions of Asterisk - only Fonality's own software. I think the > pricetag is around US$1000 for HUDpro. > Of course they would like to sell HUDpro to a larger audience, so > probably HUDlite is put out to generate interest, gather feedback and > check for bugs/features. > > Martin > > > On Monday 05 June 2006 18:12, Philip Mullis wrote: > > from what ive read three seems to be some deals going down with > fonality > > :P perhaps might be turning into a freeware version of something they > > will later pop a commercial upgrade option for :P. > > > > Chuck Mariotti wrote: > > > > >Can someone shed some light on this apparent switcharoo? Not a lot of > > >members on this new site in 5 days, not many postings. I would have > > >thought a lot more would have happened... > > > > > >Is this going down a dark path or is it truly just a name change? I > see > > >some mention of HUDlite, looks like they're trying to commercialize > > >their professional (pay) version... Not sure if that's good or bad. > > > > > >Should I be looking at a better Compliation/implementation if there > is > > >one. I'm not hard-core Linux (yet)... I like the appliance idea for > now. > > > > > >Of course, is Trixbox still worthy of talking about on this mailing > list > > >now (to some I guess they never thought it was even as > [EMAIL PROTECTED])? > > > > > >Regards, > > > > > >Chuck > > > > > > > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
