-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>>>>> "John" == John Lange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> One thing that I think a lot of coders would agree with is
John> that that the Asterisk code base is not pretty. Asterisk
John> started out as a hack and from what I've seen has continued on
John> this way for a very long time never really getting any better.
vs what?
Have you looked at other proprietary PBX systems?
I know someone that works on such a system, in C++ on MS, and he wishes his
cow-orkers would write code as nice as asterisk.
John> Asterisk is also still lacking some features that are consider
John> standard on most PBXs. 1) Faxing (T38 support is due in 1.4).
yup.
John> Its pretty clear that software based phone systems based on
John> open standards are the way of the future.
- --
] ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine. | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Xelerance Corporation, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/mcr/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [
"The Microsoft _Get the Facts CD_ does not work on Linux." - orospakr
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys
iQEVAwUBRJCB7oCLcPvd0N1lAQK1nAf+PiJ+aDcfKBHajonC1NPZYVEpI3/JXPF+
mRhU4AKSUzUb9q2Z01zyENNePQDdeExFdBOvLdY7VsY5iklMcGR5TIAsrFiKaGRr
c/xN2HdeLbgFOi5Odx+3PZAXR7BDxMVC0PLkkH5sTV8Sjmd4WUUKmdyF4iI1iIyi
tQKDIAPj+iCV0ggeI/EJUHYiiUC3q8rwRq9SiouAOijorHbOpmh3AltzQFiZx2xS
TmKdwQrbORnkLjXq25pURpJVCaog6SiaiPJyBjJ5Loa0ar/CphpiaRQJxzdSHGXG
ST+4R/wFWUTfZE0Rz2O3rrAXS2smJ3GbAzOPtbBBePG+fcXst8DZrA==
=v1kc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
