Its symmetric, I'm still a little loathe to try a pc for a router at a clients side, I'd rather have a solid state device.
For my own business both (asterisk and pfsense) are perfect, but the point is I think for software on generic computers you still need a sys admin, if that's your core business to provide system services/maintenance then its a great fit to sell them as solutions! On 9/12/06, Dave Donovan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Shidan. I know you've asked for experience and I can't say that I've ever tried to tie more than 2 of anything together. However, I was at Phillip's presentation a few meetings ago and I got the idea that PFSense was a pretty capable open source product for multiwan applications. From the demo, I don't see any reason why you couldn't put a few quad port cards into a machine and go from there. The only limitation we discussed was related to a restriction to 1 PPOE connection but that was supposed to have been solved in the next release which should be out by now. Of course, this is where I would solicit Philip's expert advice. :-) Dr Phil? Give us your wisdom. WRT your question about T1-like performance, is this symmetric or asymmetric? Even if you tie a whole bunch of asymmetric lines together aren't you still going to have a huge imbalance between TX and RX rates? Dave On 9/12/06, Shidan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anyone here had experiences with DSL load balancers they want to share? > I have > 12 dry lines that I want a good router setup for. Preferably something solid > state, but I'm interested in anyone that has tried this with PC's, as well. > so any recommendations or advice highly appreciated! > > Cheers, > Shidan > > > -- David Donovan Consultant Fulcrum Solutions --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
