Huh, I'd never heard of bellster or fwdOUT before, that's exactly what I was looking for when the DUNDi-test group kind of died out.
I was aware of the negative issues around such a network but was happy enough from my point of view in giving it a go and with enough warnings on the web site to others who might want to join. Now that I know about fwdOut though, I'll give joining that a try and see how it goes. Thanks, Colin On 10/11/06, Duane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmmm another bellster, there is a number of problems with offering such things... Myself and others wrote numerous points on why such offerings are "bad" and you might want to look at these points: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/fwdOUT There is also other reasons why you wouldn't want to offer such services using DUNDI as it has it's own set of issues, which is why enum exists in the first place as it scales 10000x better then DUNDI ever will, in fact if you get a large enough network of servers you will eventually flood the network with requests and/or flapping, lookup time degradation etc etc etc... We list all kinds of routes in e164.org and if people are willing to approach this professionally and sensibly there is no reason why these routes can't also be listed in e164.org rather then using DUNDI... -- Best regards, Duane http://www.cacert.org - Free Security Certificates http://www.nodedb.com - Think globally, network locally http://www.sydneywireless.com - Telecommunications Freedom http://e164.org - Because e164.arpa is a tax on VoIP "In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
