Yeah, accountable access control is probably the most difficult question to be answered. Supervision is obviously a challenge for a zero-revenue group ;-)
Maybe something like: - Access is granted using a trust relationship; you have to have a certain number of people who will vouch for you - Regular inventory audits (barcode/RFID everything to make it an EZ task) - No-fault damaged equipment reporting (may need some workshops to make sure people know how to wire X to Y without shorting Z) On 11/23/06, Dave Donovan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/23/06, Simon P. Ditner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This seems entirely unreasonable, but I'll put it out there anyways... > > I'd like TAUG to have a hardware lab where we can tinker. Does anyone > have some free square feet that could be accessed by our general > membership, or know of some way we could swing that? > I think it sounds like a neat idea. Could we strike a deal with a community college or something whereby we provide the equipment and the setup, and their students could play with it? One downside to that is that the equipment could be abused. We've had a few phones go bad in the Aastra demo pool just by accident. If students found out that doing X,Y and Z would fry a phone, we might come in to find all the phones fried. In a school lab, anything that _can_ be exploited, _will_ be exploited. Even if the only gain is DOS or destruction. I really like the idea, it has great potential. I just wonder how we would implement it. How would we control who accessed the facility from TAUG? Would we appoint several wardens or chaperones to accompany people or authorize them for entry? If we go entirely on an honour system, it's possible that some sticky fingered person could go in and relieve us of our equipment. If this were one of those web based forums, we could say something like: "You must acquire 500 karma points (or something) before you can use the lab" That way it's an incentive for people to participate and contribute and it establishes them as part of the community before they're given unconditional trust. I'm not sure how that could be done with the email system unless majordomo put "grant karma (+1)" and "report a jerk (-1)" links on the bottom of each message, then we could use a simple php script to keep scores for each person. But now I'm creating all kinds of work. Well, this is what happens when I just think 'aloud' in an email. I'll give it some more thought and I'd like to know what thoughts everyone else has. Dave
-- | It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what | you know for sure that just ain't so. -- Mark Twain | | The Toronto Asterisk Users Group | Join the discussion group by visiting http://taug.ca
