In all fairness, we have a pair of A102 (Non -D) and we've had nothing but success from them. It maybe that Bell provides some sort of echo canning as we're pretty far from the CO but from day one, we've had no issues with echo. We only have half a PRI, so it may be that you'll need the extra CPU savings by doing echo onboard. As for the general ability of the echo suppression on Sangoma hardware, it is nothing short of amazing, we built up an analog system for a client and our Digium hardware had lots of echo, switch to the Sangoma card and it disappeared. Chad
________________________________ From: Bruce Nik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: April 15, 2007 9:31 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [on-asterisk] Sangoma A102 VS A102d Hello everyone, I just wanted an expert advice on the two Sangoma cards, A102 and A102D. A102 is the older one without hardware echo cancelor and A102d is the one with echo cancelor. Can anyone tell me if it is really worth the $500-$600 more to get the hardware echo cancel? If using the full PRI would it be a problem to not have echo cancelation on board? Thanks ________________________________ Invite your mail contacts to join your friends list with Windows Live Spaces. It's easy! Try it! <http://spaces.live.com/spacesapi.aspx?wx_action=create&wx_url=/friends. aspx&mkt=en-us>
