>>I think that to be fair, Polycom's configuration files are intended for a
different audience than our average TAUG user. 
 
true enough. I have a set of templates that I go back to for ease of
configuration, I am sure others do the same or maybe have a better way doing
this. But as I suggested before, it would be quite handy to have a
configuration tool that creates the config files......for the first timer,
this would help in reducing the learning curve
 
>>Polycom's intended audience is really the enterprise users.  For an
enterprise customer, some investment in understanding the complexity of the
config files can pay off down the road with the impressive flexibility they
offer.  
 
maybe they actually have some sort of configuration editor or app for the
enterprise customer that takes care of all the details from one central
place etc....I havent heard of one, but that isnt to say if it doesnt exist!
 
Elliott

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Donovan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 12:01 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [on-asterisk] Polycoms too difficult to configure?


I think that to be fair, Polycom's configuration files are intended for a
different audience than our average TAUG user.

For many of the people borrowing a phone, Asterisk is a hobby or side
interest and this is one of their first hard phones. 

Polycom's intended audience is really the enterprise users.  For an
enterprise customer, some investment in understanding the complexity of the
config files can pay off down the road with the impressive flexibility they
offer. 

I haven't looked at their web interface in a couple of years so I'd be
reluctant to comment on that.  

I think Elliott has a very constructive suggestion WRT a configurator that
produced a set of files.  

Another alternative would be a console app (bash, python, php) that
basically asked a series of questions (location of TFTP directory, Asterisk
server address, SIP username, SIP Secret, etc) and spit out the files and
set their permissions to something fairly compatible. 

Maybe we could include a 1 page set of basic instructions to get people
started?  Is that redundant when one considers the Wiki?

Dave


On 5/3/07, Simon P. Ditner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

Hi all, 

Reza commented the other day that no one seems to be interested in
borrowing the Polycom phones because they were too difficult to
configure, so I was wondering if this is the case, and if perhaps
people had feedback about them that they would like passed on to 
Polycom... Send me your comments and gripes, and I'll forward them on
to our rep.

Cheers,
spd

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Reply via email to