"You can't have everything" sounded like what Bell's altitude. Now Bell is begging me repeatedly to try to earn me back as their customer.
I would be more subjective when looking at a case... The $2.5 is nothing but a provisioned number in the equipment. I have to run the asterisk server at my end... Thanks, Richard -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Kohlsmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 7:35 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [on-asterisk] Call forward not available - very expensive On Wednesday 06 June 2007 4:43 pm, Richard (Rogers @ work) wrote: > Not sure if I really agree on the high charge for such feature only used > once in a while, but I wonder if anyone has an alternative for such > situation. Well, you're paying $2.50/mo for a number that Bell would charge you at least $35/mo for... You can't have everything. -A. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
