Shidan, Duane: Thanks for your feedback. Me and my team are developing our own software that has certain specific needs that meet our criteria. The decision to stay away from AGI is more of business & logistics. Each developer and team has their own style and I respect & recognize that. We want to stay away from AGI (at least for the immediate future) - and investigate ways (if available) for my original inquiry.
Best, Reza. > I'd have to agree with Duane here. There are very little cases where AGI's > aren't suitable. > > On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Duane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Depends on your application, freepbx seems to use it, although I find >> freepbx limiting compared to hand coding asterisk configs myself, >> although it is what it is and does what it does. >> >> What's so limiting about AGI? I find Asterisk unable to handle >> registrations/calls a long time before AGI kills performance. >> >> If the starting up and tearing down of processes is causing problems you >> run the app as FastAGI instead, it doesn't even have to be on the same >> machine. >> >> Failing those suggestions you are left with a clear choice/decision, >> write or pay someone to write a suitable asterisk module, or use some >> other software that will do what you're attempting. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
