I have successfully flashed a couple of WRT160N's (not NL) with DD-WRT. They've been running for a few months now without any issues.
Performance seems better than the WRT54GL (it's got a 300MHz CPU). Another plus is wireless N support. Other than the price ($150+) there isn't really anything I can say the WRT54GL was better. -----Original Message----- From: Apache [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Henry L.Coleman Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 11:35 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [on-asterisk] A good replacement for Linksys WRT54 Thanks John, when you get one of these new routers could you do a review for us ? I know there are many TAUG members who love the WRT54 router (as I do) and would be interested in the latest and greatest product. H Henry L.Coleman [VoIP-PBX.ca] ------------------------------------------------- > John Lange< > On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 23:14 -0400, Henry L.Coleman wrote: >> Any suggestion on a good replacement for a WRT54 series that can handle SIP >> - these seem to have been replaced by >> other routers making them hard to find. Any small 4 port will do (but not >> Dlink):) > > Yes the WRT54 series is in the process of being discontinued. So far the > WRT54GL is still being manufactured but not for long. > > The good news is, the WRT160NL is the replacement and (according to > Linksys) it can be flashed with new firmware. I don't have one yet so I > haven't been able to test it with tomato. > > -- > John Lange > http://www.johnlange.ca > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
