Hi Andrew: You are correct, current calls are still dropped.
Bill > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Heagle [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 7:41 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [on-asterisk] Asterisk as a reduntant/fail over solution > > On Wednesday 10 February 2010 15:33:24 Dave Donovan wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Robert Brock <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Coming from the Nortel world (well Avaya now) I have integrated an > > > Asterisk server to all our Meridian PBX systems to support VOIP and > > > interoffice calls using G729 and it actually works better than the > Nortel > > > solution. > > > > > > Over the next few years we are planning to retire our Nortel PBX > systems, > > > however these system are rock solid from reliability point of view; > I > > > have not had any problems with the Asterisk servers that I setup > and they > > > are working much better than expected. With that said I would like > to > > > hear/know about what people have done to make the asterisk server a > high > > > availability solution. > > > > Hi Robert, > > > > You might get some good ideas from a presentation that Bill > Sandiford, > > one of our members, made to the group a couple of years ago. > > > > http://taug.ca/node/68 > > Hi, > > If one were to implement this, would current calls be dropped or would > they > get re-established after the fail-over from the master to the slave was > completed? > > It didn't mention this in the presentation. I'm guessing current calls > would > still be dropped. > > > Thanks, > Andrew > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
