Hi,

In your zap/dahdi config file, set those to no

facilityenable = no
transfer = no

Those variable need to be set in order to enable 2BCT.
Or, you could try to leave asterisk in the path by recording the conversation.

Jimmy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> Sent: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:07:17 -0400
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [on-asterisk] Native ZAP bridge fails on PRI between two
> channels
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Sorry for the spam but I am trying to get to the bottom of this.
> 
> Still looking further into bugs posted on Digium tracker and I am coming
> close to TBCT also know as 2BCT and RLT. I think LibPRI generates some
> sort of request for RLT on the PRI and since we have not requested that
> service from Bell Canada then it fails.
> 
> Facility (98):
> 
> Message not compatible with call state or message type nonexistent or not
> implemented.
> And Facility (98) error check in /usr/src/libpri/pri_facility.c points me
> to error messages related to RLT and AOC-E.
> 
> Specially this part of it:
> Facility (len=22, codeset=0) [ 0x91, 0xA1, 0x11, 0x02, 0x01, 0x06, 0x06,
> 0x07, '*', 0x86, 'H', 0xCE, 0x15, 0x00, 0x08, '0', 0x03, 0x02, 0x01, 0x03
> ]
> 
> Stephan, I know you used to play with RLT and Bell. Have you faced this
> before?
> 
> Am I on the right track at all :-)
> 
> Regards,
> Bruce
> 
> 
>> From: [email protected]
>> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
>> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:27:35 -0400
>> Subject: RE: [on-asterisk] Native ZAP bridge fails on PRI between two
>> channels
>> 
>> 
>> I can further confirm that if inbound is through PRI and outbound is
>> through analogue line the ZAP or vice versa the native bridge works just
>> fine. So, I doubt it's a function problem.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Are there any PRI debug gurus out there who can decipher the lingo in
>> the debug I posted in my initial post or the following?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ****************************************
>> 
>>>> -- Zap/2-1 answered Zap/1-1
>>>> -- Native bridging Zap/1-1 and Zap/2-1
>>>> 
>>>>> Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8) len=27
>>>>> Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 96/0x60) (Originator)
>>>>> Message type: FACILITY (98)
>>>>> [1c 14 91 a1 11 02 01 06 06 07 2a 86 48 ce 15 00 08 30 03 02 01 61]
>>>>> Facility (len=22, codeset=0) [ 0x91, 0xA1, 0x11, 0x02, 0x01, 0x06,
>>>>> 0x06, 0x07, '*', 0x86, 'H', 0xCE, 0x15, 0x00, 0x08, '0', 0x03, 0x02,
>>>>> 0x01, 'a' ]
>>>>> 
>>>> PROTOCOL 11
>>>> A1 0011 (CONTEXT SPECIFIC [1])
>>>> 02 0001 06 (INTEGER: 6)
>>>> 06 0007 2A 86 48 CE 15 00 08 (OBJECTIDENTIFIER: 2a 86 48 ce 15 00 08)
>>>> 30 0003 (SEQUENCE)
>>>> 02 0001 61 (INTEGER: 97)
>>>> < Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8) len=9
>>>> < Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 96/0x60) (Terminator)
>>>> < Message type: DISCONNECT (69)
>> ***********************************************************************
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Bruce
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:26:36 -0400
>>> From: [email protected]
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: [on-asterisk] Native ZAP bridge fails on PRI between two
>>> channels
>>> 
>>> What does the incoming callerID look like, and do you just send that
>>> out
>>> unmodified? Try to change it do something else just for testing
>>> purposes.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 4/11/2010 5:56 PM, Bruce N wrote:
>>>> Hi Guys,
>>>> 
>>>> I am calling out to 416-999-1111 on Channel 1 of PRI and sending the
>>>> call to a context that then dials 416-999-2222 on Channel 2 of PRI.
>>>> When the two channels are going to be ZAP native bridged, both
>>>> channels hangup and CLI show PRI cause (16).
>>>> 
>>>> Asterisk Verbose (Channel 1 already connected to party):
>>>> 
>>>> -- Requested transfer capability: 0x00 - SPEECH
>>>> -- Called g0/4169992222
>>>> -- Zap/2-1 is proceeding passing it to Zap/1-1
>>>> -- Zap/2-1 is ringing
>>>> -- Zap/2-1 answered Zap/1-1
>>>> -- Native bridging Zap/1-1 and Zap/2-1
>>>> -- Channel 0/1, span 1 got hangup request, cause 16
>>>> -- Hungup 'Zap/2-1'
>>>> == Spawn extension (zap-bridge, s, 8) exited non-zero on 'Zap/1-1'
>>>> -- Hungup 'Zap/1-1'
>>>> 
>>>> Here is PRI debug, starting just before Channel two is connected until
>>>> both channels are disconnected (maybe FACILITY 98 is of interest?!):
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> < Message type: CONNECT (7)
>>>> q931.c:3626 q931_receive: call 32865 on channel 2 enters state 10
>>>> (Active)
>>>> 
>>>>> Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8) len=5
>>>>> Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 97/0x61) (Originator)
>>>>> Message type: CONNECT ACKNOWLEDGE (15)
>>>>> 
>>>> -- Zap/2-1 answered Zap/1-1
>>>> -- Native bridging Zap/1-1 and Zap/2-1
>>>> 
>>>>> Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8) len=27
>>>>> Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 96/0x60) (Originator)
>>>>> Message type: FACILITY (98)
>>>>> [1c 14 91 a1 11 02 01 06 06 07 2a 86 48 ce 15 00 08 30 03 02 01 61]
>>>>> Facility (len=22, codeset=0) [ 0x91, 0xA1, 0x11, 0x02, 0x01, 0x06,
>>>>> 0x06, 0x07, '*', 0x86, 'H', 0xCE, 0x15, 0x00, 0x08, '0', 0x03, 0x02,
>>>>> 0x01, 'a' ]
>>>>> 
>>>> PROTOCOL 11
>>>> A1 0011 (CONTEXT SPECIFIC [1])
>>>> 02 0001 06 (INTEGER: 6)
>>>> 06 0007 2A 86 48 CE 15 00 08 (OBJECTIDENTIFIER: 2a 86 48 ce 15 00 08)
>>>> 30 0003 (SEQUENCE)
>>>> 02 0001 61 (INTEGER: 97)
>>>> < Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8) len=9
>>>> < Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 96/0x60) (Terminator)
> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> System Info:
>>>> Bell Canada PRI
>>>> Asterisk 1.4.21.2
>>>> Lib PRI 1.4.10
>>>> 
>>>> Dialplan is as simple as this after first channel has already picked
>>>> up:
>>>> 
>>>> [bridge-calls]
>>>> 
>>>> exten => s,1,Playback(beep)
>>>> exten => s,n,Dial(ZAP/g0/${destNumb})
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Bruce
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail & Messenger are available on your phone. Try now.
> http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9724461

____________________________________________________________
GET FREE SMILEYS FOR YOUR IM & EMAIL - Learn more at 
http://www.inbox.com/smileys
Works with AIM®, MSN® Messenger, Yahoo!® Messenger, ICQ®, Google Talk™ and most 
webmails

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to