Why not go with a point 2 point solution for $100 - $250 a month rather then relying on a cell network or EOL issues? Its going to be faster then bringing fibre into the building!
________________________________ From: Bruce N <[email protected]> To: asterisk Mailing <[email protected]> Sent: Fri, March 18, 2011 12:37:28 PM Subject: RE: [on-asterisk] Recommendations for Internet Sticks for area around Pearson Airport I would be interested to know the delay and jitter on that as well. Maybe even give us a ping of Yahoo.com too please along with google. A bit more info: - DSL in this area is not good as CO is very far from here. Repeaters add another problem to the dimension when it rains. - Rogers cable is available but I am not sure if they can give out the 2Mbps up they are claiming they can. Hence I was looking for a backup on stick and also maybe off-load some channels through the stick. Thanks for all the great input guys. I will be doing some more research in the days to come. -Bruce > From: [email protected] > Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:36:27 -0400 > To: [email protected] > CC: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [on-asterisk] Recommendations for Internet Sticks for area > around >Pearson Airport > > Patrick, > > your Bell internet 5M down and 4M up is amazing. When you have a moment can > you tell me the delay from your side to google DNS 8.8.8.8 and > www.pingtest.net test ... jitter level. > > How much you are paying for Bell ? Is this on a contract? > > > Thanks and regards, > Aloysius Lloyd > SunTel Technologies > t. +1-416-479-0505 x 203 > e. [email protected] > w. www.sunteltech.ca > > > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Patrick Song <[email protected]> wrote: > > > With my Bell internet stick, I am able to receive 5M down and 4M up > > > > On 3/17/11, James Knott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Edward Kuhn wrote: > > >> I'm not sure on your usage either but after a quick read I am guessing > > it > > >> is > > >> for connection redundancy. If that is the case I would think that the > > >> wireless connection goes to a nearby cell site and then directly into > > the > > >> Rogers cable Internet infrastructure. How suitable that is as fail-over > > >> for > > >> a direct Rogers cable connection I am not sure. > > > > > > It wouldn't be a cable connection at the nearest tower. Cell networks > > > use fibre or microwave "back haul" to get the calls & data back to some > > > common site. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Sent from my mobile device > > > > Thank you > > > > Patrick Song > > > > CCIE #28023, CCVP > > M.Eng in Telecommunications > > Cell:1-647-868-2950 > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > >
