What do you see disappearing with IPv6? Two reasons I see it staying as it is are that we would still have firewalls to contend with in a pure IPv6 world, and multiple interfaces with addresses on a single client is now common rather than exceptional (i.e. a cellphone with Bluetooth, Wifi, and LTE, all having IPv6 addresses). So we would still need ICE for address candidate selection, and in the case of aggressive firewalls, need a TURN server for RTP relay.
Cheers, spd Simon P. Ditner <si...@uc.org> http://www.facebook.com/spditner http://www.linkedin.com/in/spditner On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 10:00 PM, James Knott <james.kn...@rogers.com> wrote: > On 05/17/2015 09:54 PM, Simon Ditner wrote: > > and a TURN server (which is also a superset of STUN) > > to assist in ICE negotiation and offer RTP relay in the event that the > two > > peers can't establish an RTP channel directly between themselves. > > Don't you just love all the crap sticking with IPv4 forces us to use! > With IPv6 many of those problems disappear. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: asterisk-unsubscr...@uc.org > For additional commands, e-mail: asterisk-h...@uc.org > >
