Kristian Kielhofner wrote: > Philip, > > http://www.soekris.com/Issue0004.htm > > Says nothing about the issue being limited to the net5501-70. Only > "most of the first batch". I suppose if most/all of the first batch > were net5501-70s it would only apply to the first batch of net5501-70s > (assuming the entire first batch was -70s). Anyway, from an AstLinux > support perspective I consider ALL of them to be suspect (and will for > quite some time). > > I still freak out every once in a while about the DP83815 cable > length attenuation issues from the early net4801s! > > Are you saying your clock on the -60 is fine? > >
Jeff wrote me: > Are you sure both boards have the RTC issue? I show you bought a > 5501-70 that should, but the 5501-60 should be OK. Just checking > before sending the replacements. It's almost certain that the net5501-70 and -60 were done as different batches, since the bins (memory, timing caps, etc) would have had to be replaced anyway on any automated assembly line. Unless they wanted to pay for faster memory than they needed... -Philip ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Astlinux-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
