David,
Yes, it would be a great idea to use something other than 192.168.0.0/24 or
192.168.1.0/24. I have a scheme where each of my clients gets a different
subnet (unless they had something previously configured). Figure when I run
out of subnets, I'll have bigger problems ;)
Darrick
________________________________
From: David Kerr [da...@kerr.net]
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2011 9:51 AM
To: AstLinux Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] VPN config
Now that I have OpenVPN running, it occurs to me that I might run into a
problem. If I am at a friends house whose local network is also 192.168.1.xx
and my network at home is 192.168.1.xx then the OpenVPN client would get
confused/would not know what to do. Right?
If this is the case, and as 192.168.1.xx is a very common subnet -- being the
default for a lot of consumer routers, then it would make sense for me to
change my home network to something a little more obscure like 192.168.yy.xx
where yy is a random number in the, oh lets say 128 to 255 range. Or even take
it into the 10.xx.yy.zz subnet?
Thoughts?
David
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2
_______________________________________________
Astlinux-users mailing list
Astlinux-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users
Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to
pay...@krisk.org.
