I'm equally stumped. What kind of hardware are you using?
Lonnie On Dec 20, 2011, at 6:31 PM, Shamus Rask wrote: > Lonnie, > > This is on a new CF card; I've (wisely now) kept my "production" card safe. > That being said, I've just tried two experiments to see if there would be any > differences and eliminate some possible variables: > • experiment 1: using a second spare CF card of different make (Lexar > vs. Transcend), use Mac to flash image > • experiment 2: try using physdiskwrite on WinXP to flash image instead > of Mac. > > In each case, the same result was seen--over 25m to boot. > > I tried editing syslinux.cfg as per your suggestion and again, no > improvement. I'm really scratching my head on this one! > > cheers, > Shamus > > > On 2011-12-20, at 1:46 PM, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote: > >> Shamus, >> >> I have never seen that sort of issue before, we could pursue Darrick's idea >> that it is ide DMA related. >> >> Mount your CF card on your Mac and with a text editor, edit "syslinux.cfg? >> -- >> label runnix >> kernel runnix >> append initrd=runnix.img root=/dev/ram0 rw init=/runnix runimg=auto >> ide_core.nodma=0.0 ide_core.nodma=0.1 ide_core.nodma=1.0 ide_core.nodma=1.1 >> rootdelay=10 >> -- >> edit to remove all the ide_core.nodma=* entries. ie... >> -- >> label runnix >> kernel runnix >> append initrd=runnix.img root=/dev/ram0 rw init=/runnix runimg=auto >> rootdelay=10 >> -- >> If that helps, you can do that with your "os/astlinux-1.0.0.run.conf" KCMD >> line as well. >> >> Let us know if that helps. >> >> Question, did this CF card work with 0.7 ? >> >> Lonnie >> >> >> On Dec 20, 2011, at 12:26 PM, Shamus Rask wrote: >> >>> Lonnie, >>> >>> Please see attached. This is where the box spends a lot of time; each of >>> the "." following Loading represents ~20s. They appear on the screen very >>> slowly... >>> >>> cheers, >>> Shamus >>> >>> <screen capture.jpeg> >>> >>>> Message: 1 >>>> Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 22:33:18 -0600 >>>> From: Lonnie Abelbeck <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] runnix very slow--AstLinux 1.0.0 >>>> To: AstLinux Users Mailing List <[email protected]> >>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >>>> >>>> Shamus, >>>> >>>> You imply this is a video console, can you take a photo of the console >>>> where it seems to take a long time to boot. >>>> >>>> This type of info would help alot. >>>> >>>> Lonnie >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Dec 19, 2011, at 8:51 PM, Shamus Rask wrote: >>>> >>>>> First of all... a huge congratulations and thank you to Lonnie, Derek and >>>>> the other developers for reaching the 1.0 milestone--thank you!!! >>>>> >>>>> I've downloaded and copied 1.0.0-Asterisk-1.8.7.1 (Generic i586) onto a >>>>> CF card and loaded this into my existing PBX. The box is currently >>>>> running AstLinux-0.7.10 (Asterisk 1.4.42, runnix 0.3.2). I've found that >>>>> the new image take ~30m to boot on the box--by comparison my current >>>>> release takes < 1m. >>>>> >>>>> When I watch the CLI following POST, I see that the following is what is >>>>> taking the time: >>>>> boot: >>>>> Loading runnix.................. >>>>> Loading runnix.img............. >>>>> >>>>> This is consistent between reboots. >>>>> >>>>> Is there anything I can do to optimize runnix in any way? My box is Via >>>>> C7 based. >>>>> >>>>> cheers, >>>>> Shamus >>> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Write once. Port to many. Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev _______________________________________________ Astlinux-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to [email protected].
