Hey Lonnie, thanks for sharing. Remember my setup I posted not too long ago. I 
was wondering what my "wdmodule " "sensemods" in /mnt/kd/rc.conf.d/user.conf 
and /mnt/kd/sensors.conf settings should be for my "D2700MUD MINI-ITX ATOM" 
board.

Thanks much as always :)



My existing setup still running strong:

- Casetronic Travla C138 Mini-ITX case black 
---> http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001KZ1H2E/ref=oh_o00_s00_i00_details

- INTEL RETAIL D2700MUD MINI-ITX ATOM INTEGRATED 
---> http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00797U2ZA/ref=oh_o02_s00_i00_details


- Kingston ValueRAM 4GB 1066MHz DDR3 Non-ECC Notebook Memory 
---> http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001PYDKWU/ref=oh_o01_s00_i00_details


- Patriot Torqx 2 64GB SSD 
---> http://www.amazon.com/Patriot-Memory-Torqx-2-5-Inch-PT264GS25SSDR/dp/B004XVN1TO/ref=sr_1_1?
s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1330291923&sr=1-1


- TDM410P V2 for Digium Asterisk PBX
---> http://www.ebay.com/itm/TDM400P-TDM410P-V2-for-Digium-Asterisk-PBX-1FXO-3-FXS-Echo-Cancellation-Socket/170773174342?ssPageName=WDVW&rd=1&ih=007&category=11908&cmd=ViewItem#ht_2125wt_972





________________________________
 From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lonnie.abelbeck.com>
To: AstLinux Users Mailing List <astlinux-users@lists.sourceforge.net> 
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2012 2:15 PM
Subject: [Astlinux-users] Jetway NF99FL-525 Dual Core Atom
 
Hi,

We added a new reference system to the AstLinux WiKi:

Jetway NF99FL-525 Dual Core Atom
http://doc.astlinux.org/userdoc:board_jetway_nf99fl-525

In addition to the previous reference system:

Jetway NF96FL-525 Dual Core Atom
http://doc.astlinux.org/userdoc:board_jetway_nf96fl-525


The NF99FL-525 vs NF96FL-525 Pros:

1) 2x Intel PCI-e (82574L) Gb NIC's on motherboard.  Use VLAN's for multiple 
internal interfaces/networks with a switch.

2) Runs cooler than the Jetway '96 board with daughter board ('99 w/o daughter 
board), and uses slightly less power 20W vs 23W.  Most likely the '99 could be 
run without a fan in some cases.


The NF99FL-525 vs NF96FL-525 Cons:

1) Currently there is no hardware watchdog support.  Though WDMODULE="softdog" 
works.  The Intel "iTCO_wdt" module does not work with this board and the 
current AstLinux Linux 2.6.35 kernel does not support the watchdog on the 
Fintek chip.  The Jetway '96 board supports the Intel "iTCO_wdt" module.

2) No legacy IDE interface.


In my iperf tests:

The '99 will route at Gb line speed (928 Mbps) at 77% idle (via top).

The '96 will route at "near" Gb line speed (810 Mbps) at 73% idle (via top).

Other users' comments and experiences are always welcomed.

Lonnie

PS:  Disclaimer, in no way is the AstLinux Team guaranteeing the above 
reference hardware, we simply have tested the hardware with AstLinux and it 
appears to work as expected.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Astlinux-users mailing list
Astlinux-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users

Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to 
pay...@krisk.org.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Astlinux-users mailing list
Astlinux-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users

Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to 
pay...@krisk.org.

Reply via email to