-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Keuter [mailto:li...@mksolutions.info] 
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 12:34 PM
To: AstLinux Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Backup => Restore to Different Platform?


Am 29.11.2012 um 17:53 schrieb Dan Ryson:

> Hello!
> 
> It seems my long run of good fortune has taken a turn for the worse.  
> After years of rock-solid AstLinux reliability, I've run into some 
> trouble.  I'm hopeful that your expertise can help me get back to better
times.
> 
> Sorry...  This is a bit of a ramble.  But I'd like to provide a 
> detailed view of what we are seeing before soliciting your thoughts.
> 
> Six hours after putting new hardware into service, I was INUNDATED 
> with file system related error messages in the log.  I've pasted a 
> snippet below, which repeated continuously every few seconds for 
> several hours until I shut it down.
> 
> This is the second time I've encountered this symptom in just a few days.
> Both events were on virtually on the same hardware, a brand new
NF99FL-525.
> The first time this symptom appeared, I was temporarily using a USB 
> thumb drive in lieu of the recommended Emphase Industrial SATA module.  
> Because I suspected both the USB thumb drive and my twist on the 
> official installation procedure, I later installed the proper SATA 
> module and asked our group for advice regarding the general idea of 
> copying /oldroot/mnt/asturw from one platform to another.  (Thanks 
> again for the ideas and comments.) Regardless, the symptom has repeated.
> 
> Here is a more detailed version of the installation procedure that I used:

> 
> 1.)  Physdiskwrite.exe under Windows to write the SATA image
> 2.)  Boot from SATA on NF99FL-525
> 3.)  Use web interface to create a new /dev/sda2, install sounds, etc.
> 3.)  Use a Linux version of FileZilla to download /oldroot/mnt/asturw 
> from the old Soekris net5501
> 4.)  Use the same Filezilla to upload /oldroot/mnt/asturw to the new
> NF99FL-525
> 5.)  Reboot
> 6.)  Test
> 7.)  Put in service
> 
> The first time around (booting from USB last Friday), the unit worked 
> fine for ~36 hours and then starting throwing I/O errors.  When I 
> realized this was happening, I remotely requested a reboot.  The 
> machine shut down but didn't come back up until I arrived on-site and
cycled the power.
> 
> This time (booting from SATA flash yesterday evening), it ran only ~6 
> hours before errors appeared.  Before rebooting, I downloaded the 
> messages file and noticed these symptoms:  When I called into my voice 
> mail, app_voicemail generated this WARNING:  "Unable to stream 
> password file".  When dialing into our conference bridge, the dial 
> plan tried but failed to Playback sound file "conf-thereare".  
> App_playback WARNED, "ast_streamfile failed for conf-thereare."
> 
> Upon a power cycle and reboot this morning, I noticed "fsck detected 
> errors on sta2" which it apparently corrected.  (It went by in a 
> blur...)  After taking the unit out of service, it's been running 
> without I/O errors for a couple of hours.  However, it's really not 
> really doing anything either - except bitterly complaining about not 
> having a network route to phones or providers.
> 
> Here's the log snippet.  Imagine many MB of this, repeated over and 
> over again.  Roughly 95 percent of the lines that specify a sector 
> number, such as "I/O error, dev sda, sector 524160" show either sector
524160 or 3145616.
> Every now and again, a few other sector numbers also appear.  
> 
> Nov 29 06:31:13 sip user.info kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: [sda] Unhandled 
> error code Nov 29 06:31:13 sip user.info kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: [sda] Result:
> hostbyte=DID_BAD_TARGET driverbyte=DRIVER_OK Nov 29 06:31:13 sip 
> user.info kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: [sda] CDB: Read(10): 28 00
> 00 2f ff 90 00 00 08 00
> Nov 29 06:31:13 sip user.err kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev sda, 
> sector
> 3145616
> Nov 29 06:31:13 sip user.err kernel: EXT2-fs (sda2): previous I/O 
> error to superblock detected Nov 29 06:31:13 sip user.info kernel: sd 
> 1:0:0:0: [sda] Unhandled error code Nov 29 06:31:13 sip user.info 
> kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: [sda] Result:
> hostbyte=DID_BAD_TARGET driverbyte=DRIVER_OK Nov 29 06:31:13 sip 
> user.info kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: [sda] CDB: Write(10): 2a
> 00 00 07 ff 80 00 00 08 00
> Nov 29 06:31:13 sip user.err kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev sda, 
> sector
> 524160
> Nov 29 06:31:13 sip user.err kernel: Buffer I/O error on device sda2, 
> logical block 0 Nov 29 06:31:13 sip user.warn kernel: lost page write 
> due to I/O error on
> sda2
> Nov 29 06:31:13 sip user.crit kernel: EXT2-fs (sda2): error:
ext2_get_inode:
> unable to read inode block - inode=81936, block=327682 Nov 29 06:31:13 
> sip user.err kernel: EXT2-fs (sda2): previous I/O error to superblock 
> detected Nov 29 06:31:13 sip user.info kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: [sda] 
> Unhandled error code Nov 29 06:31:13 sip user.info kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: 
> [sda] Result:
> hostbyte=DID_BAD_TARGET driverbyte=DRIVER_OK Nov 29 06:31:13 sip 
> user.info kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: [sda] CDB: Write(10): 2a
> 00 00 07 ff 80 00 00 08 00
> Nov 29 06:31:13 sip user.err kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev sda, 
> sector
> 524160
> Nov 29 06:31:13 sip user.err kernel: Buffer I/O error on device sda2, 
> logical block 0 Nov 29 06:31:13 sip user.warn kernel: lost page write 
> due to I/O error on
> sda2
> Nov 29 06:31:13 sip user.crit kernel: EXT2-fs (sda2): error: ext2_fsync:
> detected IO error when writing metadata buffers
> 
> While this really smells like a hardware problem, it seems odd that I 
> could have both a bad USB and bad SATA flash module.  Where might I be 
> going wrong?  Other than trying the serial version (which I'll 
> probably do this afternoon), what might you do in a situation like this?
> 
> Thanks for any insight,
> 
> Dan
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lonnie Abelbeck [mailto:li...@lonnie.abelbeck.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 3:31 PM
> To: AstLinux Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Backup => Restore to Different Platform?
> 
> Hi Dan,
> 
> In addition to the "70-persistent-net.rules" file as Michael pointed 
> out, you may (or many not) have a "/etc/rc.modules" file, you will 
> need the "e1000e" line uncommented for your NF99FL-525.
> 
> Personally I prefer the geni586-serial version, but the geni586 (VGA) 
> will work fine if you prefer a video console.
> 
> Lonnie
> 
> 
> On Nov 28, 2012, at 8:55 AM, Dan Ryson wrote:
> 
>> All,
>> 
>> Following David's excellent comment about backups by rsync (pasted 
>> below),
> I've been keeping copies of /oldroot/mnt/asturw.  It's a simple, 
> painless backup procedure.
>> 
>> I'm now replacing a production Soekris net5501 with a shiny new 
>> Jetway
> NF99FL-525.  Presuming I start by installing the Generic i586 (VGA) 
> image on the Jetway, is it permissible to simply use ssh to copy the 
> Soekris' asturw file tree to the new machine?  If so, this would be a 
> brain-dead simple way to migrate to the different hardware.  Or are 
> there differences between the two asturws that will cause pain and agony?
>> 
>> Thanks for any thoughts, recommendations, or advice.
>> 
>> Dan
>> 
>> From: David Kerr [mailto:da...@kerr.net]
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 12:13 PM
>> To: AstLinux Users Mailing List
>> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Mixmonitor storage options
>> 
>> I actually do a pull from a server (actually a ReadyNAS box) for my
> AstLinux backup... rsync over ssh with certificates so no userid/password.
> The remote server has an hourly cron job that runs the rsync....
>> 
>> #!/bin/bash
>> rsync -avz -e "ssh -p<your-ssh-port>"
> root@<your-pbx-url>:/oldroot/mnt/asturw  /c/home/david/PBXbackup
>> 
>> This way there is no dependency on anything running on the Astlinux box.
> Something similar would work to pull off call recordings for safe storage.
>> 
>> David


Hi Dan,

it is possible, that there are other "hardware-related" files in ASTURW like
e.g. "/etc/blkid.tab*"
I personally wouldn't clone a complete device. 
Maybe start with a basic backup of the old box WITHOUT including ASTURW.

Michael

http://www.mksolutions.info

Hi Michael,

Indeed there is both a blkid.tab and blkid.tab.old.  

In quickly reading through the responses here, it sounds like your advice to
make a basic backup and not all of asturw is the way to go!

Thank you!

Dan


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep yourself connected to Go Parallel: 
VERIFY Test and improve your parallel project with help from experts 
and peers. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net
_______________________________________________
Astlinux-users mailing list
Astlinux-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users

Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to 
pay...@krisk.org.

Reply via email to