Thanks Lonnie

Although this looks interesting, I still have a problem with monitoring a 4G 
connection and other scenarios etc. so I will probably use WG VPN's to 
Management servers for monitoring.
Thanks for your help once again.

Regards
Michael Knill

On 24/7/19, 8:50 am, "Lonnie Abelbeck" <li...@lonnie.abelbeck.com> wrote:

    > ip route add <Zabbix IP Address> dev ppp0 tab 1
    
    This route will be removed anytime PPPoE is restarted.
    
    Otherwise ... test and test again :-)
    
    Lonnie
    
    
    
    > On Jul 23, 2019, at 5:43 PM, Michael Knill 
<michael.kn...@ipcsolutions.com.au> wrote:
    > 
    > Whoops I missed that date sorry. I need to be more observant. Although I 
assume its still the same.
    > No I don't have a path over WG and my Zabbix server pings both interfaces 
so I cant put in a static route.
    > 
    > I could however just set up policy routing for the Zabbix server so it 
doesn't break anything else e.g.:
    > ip route add <Zabbix IP Address> dev ppp0 tab 1
    > ip route add <Zabbix Address> dev eth3 tab 2
    > ip rule add from <ppp0 IP Address>/32 tab 1 priority 500
    > ip rule add from <eth3 IP Address>/32 tab 2 priority 600
    > 
    > What do you think?
    > 
    > Regards
    > Michael Knill
    > 
    > On 24/7/19, 7:34 am, "Lonnie Abelbeck" <li...@lonnie.abelbeck.com> wrote:
    > 
    > 
    > 
    >> On Jul 23, 2019, at 4:24 PM, Michael Knill 
<michael.kn...@ipcsolutions.com.au> wrote:
    >> 
    >> Yes I gathered that was the case. Hmm wonder why it was working for a 
while.
    >> So it doesn't seem too difficult to set up policy based routing from 
this article which sends traffic out the interface it was received.
    >> https://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7291
    >> 
    >> What do you think?
    > 
    >    That is a 15 year old article, while it looks mostly correct.
    > 
    >    Policy routing seems like overkill for your issue.
    > 
    >    Is there a path over WireGuard ? possibly fping the WG interface to 
see if the path is working ?
    > 
    >    Or add a static route ?
    > 
    >    Lonnie
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > 
    >> 
    >> Regards
    >> Michael Knill
    >> 
    >> On 24/7/19, 7:12 am, "Lonnie Abelbeck" <li...@lonnie.abelbeck.com> wrote:
    >> 
    >>> My assumption is that the reply will route out the primary interface so 
it will not work.
    >> 
    >>   Exactly.  If there is not a return route to your source IP the packet 
is lost.
    >> 
    >>   Or if over WireGuard, a too narrow AllowedIPs to allow the return 
packet.
    >> 
    >>   Using "ip r" at each end should tell the story.
    >> 
    >>   Lonnie
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >>> On Jul 23, 2019, at 3:58 PM, Michael Knill 
<michael.kn...@ipcsolutions.com.au> wrote:
    >>> 
    >>> Hi group
    >>> 
    >>> Forgive my ignorance but should I be able to ping the failover Astlinux 
interface if the primary is up? I cant for one of my sites but it used to work 
for some reason. The link seems fine and I can ping the secondary WAN gateway.
    >>> My assumption is that the reply will route out the primary interface so 
it will not work.
    >>> 
    >>> Regards
    >>> Michael Knill
    >>> _______________________________________________
    >>> Astlinux-users mailing list
    >>> Astlinux-users@lists.sourceforge.net
    >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users
    >>> 
    >>> Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to 
pay...@krisk.org.
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >>   _______________________________________________
    >>   Astlinux-users mailing list
    >>   Astlinux-users@lists.sourceforge.net
    >>   https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users
    >> 
    >>   Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to 
pay...@krisk.org.
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> _______________________________________________
    >> Astlinux-users mailing list
    >> Astlinux-users@lists.sourceforge.net
    >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users
    >> 
    >> Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to 
pay...@krisk.org.
    > 
    > 
    > 
    >    _______________________________________________
    >    Astlinux-users mailing list
    >    Astlinux-users@lists.sourceforge.net
    >    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users
    > 
    >    Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to 
pay...@krisk.org.
    > 
    > 
    > _______________________________________________
    > Astlinux-users mailing list
    > Astlinux-users@lists.sourceforge.net
    > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users
    > 
    > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to 
pay...@krisk.org.
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    Astlinux-users mailing list
    Astlinux-users@lists.sourceforge.net
    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users
    
    Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to 
pay...@krisk.org.


_______________________________________________
Astlinux-users mailing list
Astlinux-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users

Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to 
pay...@krisk.org.

Reply via email to