Great ... be sure to test the /23 .

Lonnie


> On Sep 5, 2021, at 6:30 PM, Michael Knill <michael.kn...@ipcsolutions.com.au> 
> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Lonnie
> 
> No that cannot happen as the softswitch only connects to a single Astlinux 
> peer IP address e.g. Peer 1 - 10.4.1.1/32, Peer 2 - 10.4.1.2/32 ....
> All the Astlinux peers would have the same locally significant range 
> 10.4.0.1-254. All calls to the softswitch from a remote peer are terminated 
> by Asterisk with no direct media.
> 
> Looks like this is what I will do then. Nice! Thanks again.
> 
> Regards
> Michael Knill
> 
> On 6/9/21, 8:11 am, "Lonnie Abelbeck" <li...@lonnie.abelbeck.com> wrote:
> 
>    That should work, be a CIDR ninja. :-)
> 
>    Though if you want your "softswitch" to route to a remote Mobile Client, 
> /23's all around might be needed.
> 
>    Lonnie
> 
> 
> 
>> On Sep 5, 2021, at 4:47 PM, Michael Knill 
>> <michael.kn...@ipcsolutions.com.au> wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks Lonnie
>> 
>> So what I am thinking is that I will use a /23 on the remote system but 
>> continue to use /24 for my softswitch on the higher subnet. This will give a 
>> total of 250 VPN connections to the Softswitch. 
>> Each remote system will then have the lower subnet for local connectivity 
>> only for mobile peers and remote peers.
>> 
>> So for your example below, the softswitch will be on 10.4.1.254/24 for 
>> instance and the remote peer will be on 10.4.1.1-250 but will be configured 
>> as a /23 so it has all 10.4.0.x for local connections.
>> 
>> What do you think?
>> 
>> Regards
>> Michael Knill
>> 
>> On 4/9/21, 12:35 pm, "Lonnie Abelbeck" <li...@lonnie.abelbeck.com> wrote:
>> 
>>   Hi Michael,
>> 
>>   As per the docs, the range of .101 to .199 is reserved for mobile clients.
>>   --
>>   Note -> Mobile Clients are automatically assigned a unique IP address in 
>> the range of .101 to .199 for the last octet (example here: 10.4.0.101 to 
>> 10.4.0.199). Best practice is to refrain from using IP's in this range for 
>> both this tunnel's “IPv4 Address” (above) and Remote Peer's IP address so 
>> both configuration types can coexist. Similarly for IPv6 the Mobile Client 
>> reserved range is …:0101 to …:0199.
>>   --
>>   When a new Mobile Client is added, it will only check other mobile clients 
>> for uniqueness, not manually added remote peers.
>> 
>> 
>>   Alternatively, if you need more than ~150 manually added remote peers, it 
>> should be possible to use a /23 (255.255.254.0) IPv4 NetMask.
>> 
>>   Using: netcalc 10.4.0.1/23
>>   --
>>   HostMin  : 10.4.0.1             00001010.00000100.0000000 0.00000001
>>   HostMax  : 10.4.1.254           00001010.00000100.0000000 1.11111110
>>   --
>>   Here the reserved mobile client range is still 10.4.0.101 to 10.4.0.199
>> 
>>   You have the previous ~150 manually added remote peer range plus a ~250 
>> 10.4.1.x range.
>> 
>>   This /23 subnet should work for the WireGuard -> Tunnel Options: -> IPv4 
>> NetMask: 255.255.254.0
>> 
>>   but I have not tested it much.  Would that work for you?
>> 
>>   Lonnie
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Sep 3, 2021, at 7:46 PM, Michael Knill 
>>> <michael.kn...@ipcsolutions.com.au> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Group
>>> 
>>> Is there any reason that I could not use the .101 to .199 subnet addresses 
>>> for Remote Peers? If I do add a mobile peer will it check Remote Peers when 
>>> allocating an IP addresses or would I need to manually check there are no 
>>> duplicates?
>>> As I am moving to cloud hosting most of my systems now with direct mobile 
>>> connectivity, I don't need to use mobile peers but I do need the address 
>>> space.
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> 
>>> Michael Knill
>>> Managing Director
>>> 
>>> D: +61 2 6189 1360
>>> P: +61 2 6140 4656
>>> E: michael.kn...@ipcsolutions.com.au
>>> W: ipcsolutions.com.au
>>> 
>>> <image001.png>
>>> Smarter Business Communications
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Astlinux-users mailing list
>>> Astlinux-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users
>>> 
>>> Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to 
>>> pay...@krisk.org.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   _______________________________________________
>>   Astlinux-users mailing list
>>   Astlinux-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>   https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users
>> 
>>   Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to 
>> pay...@krisk.org.
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Astlinux-users mailing list
>> Astlinux-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users
>> 
>> Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to 
>> pay...@krisk.org.
> 
> 
> 
>    _______________________________________________
>    Astlinux-users mailing list
>    Astlinux-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users
> 
>    Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to 
> pay...@krisk.org.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Astlinux-users mailing list
> Astlinux-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users
> 
> Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to 
> pay...@krisk.org.



_______________________________________________
Astlinux-users mailing list
Astlinux-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users

Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to 
pay...@krisk.org.

Reply via email to