> On 8 Aug 2016, at 11:16, Ludovic Gasc <gml...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Certainly some protocols/transports should be easier to have this split than
> others: Interesting to know if somebody has already tried to have QUIC and
> HTTP/2 in the same time with Python.
AFAIK they haven’t. This is partly because there’s no good QUIC implementation
to bind from Python at this time. Chromium’s QUIC library requires a giant pool
of custom C++ to bind it appropriately, and Go’s implementation includes a
gigantic runtime and is quite large.
As and when a good OSS QUIC library starts to surface, I’ll be able to answer
this question more effectively. But I’m not expecting a huge issue. =)
Cory
_______________________________________________
Async-sig mailing list
Async-sig@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/async-sig
Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
