But tests taking 1.48 longer to run on average! Anything I should know about 3.6 and performance?
On 18 November 2016 at 22:42, Luca Sbardella <luca.sbarde...@gmail.com> wrote: > Pulsar's tests are now run against 3.6-dev and all passing. > Nice! > Getting used to the C Future ;-) > > On 13 October 2016 at 06:37, INADA Naoki <songofaca...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks, Ben. >> >> Both are very helpful information! >> >> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Ben Darnell <b...@bendarnell.com> wrote: >> > [+async-sig@python.org, which is the new home for these kinds of >> > discussions] >> > >> > Tornado's tests are now failing on nightly with "TypeError: can't send >> > non-None value to a FutureIter": >> > https://travis-ci.org/tornadoweb/tornado/jobs/167252979 >> > >> > -Ben >> > >> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 3:55 PM INADA Naoki <songofaca...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > If you have asyncio based project, and it uses Travis-CI, >> >> >> >> > please add "nightly" to your .travis.cnf [2]. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > [2] >> >> >> >> > >> >> > https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/languages/python/#Choosing- >> Python-versions-to-test-against >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Travis changed the "nightly" version to 3.7 >> >> >> >> Now "3.6-dev" is for Python 3.6beta (Still 3.6b1, it may be upgraded >> >> soon). >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> INADA Naoki <songofaca...@gmail.com> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> INADA Naoki <songofaca...@gmail.com> >> > > > > -- > http://lucasbardella.com > -- http://lucasbardella.com
_______________________________________________ Async-sig mailing list Async-sig@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/async-sig Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
