On Nov 22, 2016 6:22 AM, "Alex Grönholm" <alex.gronh...@nextday.fi> wrote: > > Does this library offer any advantages over the same functionality in asyncio_extras?
You would probably know better than me, but last time I looked, the generator code in asyncio_extras didn't support asend/athrow/aclose, didn't support yield from, and took shortcuts that assume that you're using asyncio as your coroutine runner. So I believe async_generator is more complete and more correct (in the sense that it sticks strictly to implementing the language level semantics for async generators without assuming any particular runner). Of course asyncio_extras has lots of other handy things in it too, while async_generator is very strictly focused on just this one thing. (Well, I threw in an implementation of aclosing too, since you can't really use async generators without it, but that's pretty trivial.) It might make sense for asyncio_extras to out-source generator handling to async_generator? Or not. -n
_______________________________________________ Async-sig mailing list Async-sig@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/async-sig Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
