Thank you. I had seen that, but it seems heavier weight than needed. And it also requires locking on reading.
--Chris On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Andrew Svetlov <andrew.svet...@gmail.com> wrote: > There is https://github.com/aio-libs/aiorwlock > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 12:13 AM Chris Jerdonek <chris.jerdo...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> I'm relatively new to async programming in Python and am thinking >> through possibilities for doing "read-write" synchronization. >> >> I'm using asyncio, and the synchronization primitives that asyncio >> exposes are relatively simple [1]. Have options for async read-write >> synchronization already been discussed in any detail? >> >> I'm interested in designs where "readers" don't need to acquire a lock >> -- only writers. It seems like one way to deal with the main race >> condition I see that comes up would be to use loop.time(). Does that >> ring a bell, or might there be a much simpler way? >> >> Thanks, >> --Chris >> >> >> [1] https://docs.python.org/3/library/asyncio-sync.html >> _______________________________________________ >> Async-sig mailing list >> Async-sig@python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/async-sig >> Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ > > -- > Thanks, > Andrew Svetlov _______________________________________________ Async-sig mailing list Async-sig@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/async-sig Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
