Just created an Issue for this: https://bugs.python.org/issue33530
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:07 PM, twisteroid ambassador <twisteroid.ambassa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sure, I should be able to massage the code into asyncio. Probably will > need substantial help on writing any tests, though. > > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:29 AM, Yury Selivanov <yseliva...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On May 13, 2018, 9:35 AM -0400, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org>, wrote: >> >> Yury, >> >> This looks like good work.Would it make sense to add this to asyncio in 3.8? >> >> >> >> Yes, it is solid. I'd like to see this in asyncio; specifically, I suggest >> to add a keyword-only argument to loop.create_connection & >> asyncio.open_connection to use happy eyeballs (off by default). Exposing the >> "staggered_race()" helper function might also be a good idea, I'm just not >> super happy with the name. >> >> Twistero, would you be interested in submitting a PR? >> >> Yury >> _______________________________________________ Async-sig mailing list Async-sig@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/async-sig Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
