On 07/31/2014 08:49 AM, Vu Hai NGUYEN wrote: > Thank you for the patch. I applied it (manually not automatically, the patch > is not based on ath-master branch?) > The warning msg: br0: received packet on wlan0.sta1 with own address as > source address disappeared on the console of my AP. > But the performance of my bridged STA (using CT firmware) is still lower than > non-bridged STA (10.1-467 firmware). > (520 vs 550 Mbps) > > The processor of my AP is not exhausted (about 15-20% idle) but perf top on > my bridged STA show that there is this thread: br_fdb_update. > I didn't see it on non-bridged STA, it takes 5% resource of the processor > I look for it on google and this thread is related to the warning message > br0:received packet on wlan0.sta1 with own address as source address > Do you guy have any suggestion?
Is there any way at all to make the standard firmware do bridged mode? I am curious if the slow-down is due to my firmware or to bridging in general... Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear <[email protected]> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
