Arend van Spriel <ar...@broadcom.com> writes: > On 08/28/14 10:02, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Kalle Valo<kv...@qca.qualcomm.com> writes: > >> Johannes suggested to put this to a separate file as that way it's >> easier for the user space. In v3 I'm planning to create testmode_uapi.h >> for this. > > I suppose that file will/should end up in include/uapi/...
I was thinking not to put this to the include directory. This is just a testmode interface used only by few people, not a proper driver interface. > so wouldn't it be better to call it ath10k_testmode.h? We already have testmode.h so having ath10k_testmode.h in the same directory would be confusing. Would testmode_i.h be any better? -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
