On 2 March 2015 at 10:25, Johannes Berg <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 10:23 +0100, Michal Kazior wrote: > >> > I believe the whole thing isn't necessary at all since the kernel's PCIe >> > layer will take care of it. >> >> You mean only the pci_save_state() and pci_disable_device() or, the >> resume counterpart as well? Hmm. > > Resume as well - but I believe it's all-or-nothing. > >> Earlier the resume counterpart didn't do any restore stuff and the >> device ended up pretty confused.. > > which may explain this.
Hmm.. I removed the save/restore/enable/disable completely and re-tested. It seems to work fine as well. I'll post a v2 later then. Thanks! Michał _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
