On 03/03/2016 07:35 AM, Valo, Kalle wrote:
Ben Greear <[email protected]> writes:

Hello!

I'm considering a case where I have multiple ath10k NICs in
a system, possibly not all the same chipset.

I may want to have one optimized for smaller number of vdevs and more
peers, and another many vdevs, fewer peers, etc.  Some chipsets

Module options are not optimal for this since there is no easy way to
have different options for different NICs.

I'm thinking about making a loadable 'firmware' file that has
text-based config, something like:

# First radio
Device=05:00.0
        vdev_count=8
        peer_count=128
         firmware_name=firmware-5-b.bin
        firmware_ver=5

# Second radio
Device=06:00.0
        vdev_count=4
        peer_count=200
         firmware_name=firmware-2.bin
        firmware_ver=2

# End of file

Ok, so basically an .ini file for the driver.

When parsing, Lines starting with # would be ignored.
Any un-known tokens would be ignored, for backwards/forwards compatibility.

This file would be loaded and parsed before loading other firmware
images so that we can use particular firmware images per radio. This
further lets one optimize one radio for one thing, one for another.
For instance, if someone requires IBSS and wants to use stock QCA
firmware, they can use the 'main' firmware for that radio, and the
most recent one for another radio that needs to be a stable AP.

In addition to this, we would need to store the vdev combinations
in RAM in the 'ar' struct, so we could get rid of all of the static,
hard-coded members and set the capabilities to match the requested
values.

Any opinions on this?  Something that might be worthwhile for upstream?

I have seen lots of out-of-tree drivers having something like this but I
doubt that something like this would be acceptable in upstream. Anyway
this is something which should be discussed in linux-wireless with a
wider audience, maybe even in lkml.

You are the maintainer, so, do *you* like the idea?  If you don't, then
there is no use in me putting more effort into it for upstream use.

If you do, then I will work on cleaning up a patch for upstream and post
it to a wider audience.

Thanks,
Ben


--
Ben Greear <[email protected]>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com


_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

Reply via email to