On 31 March 2016 at 22:59,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Ben Greear <[email protected]>
>
> Not sure this can happen, but seems like a reasonable sanity
> check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Greear <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c 
> b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c
> index 94c27f6..172b1d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/txrx.c
> @@ -309,6 +309,7 @@ void ath10k_peer_map_event(struct ath10k_htt *htt,
>         ath10k_warn(ar, /*ATH10K_DBG_HTT,*/ "htt peer map vdev %d peer %pM id 
> %d\n",
>                    ev->vdev_id, ev->addr, ev->peer_id);
>
> +       BUG_ON(ar->peer_map[ev->peer_id] && (ar->peer_map[ev->peer_id] != 
> peer));

Does this really need to be a BUG_ON?


MichaƂ

_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

Reply via email to