Rajkumar Manoharan <[email protected]> writes:

> MSI-X is never well-tested, might contain bugs and generally isn't
> really all that useful to maintain. Also ath10k is mainly used with
> shared/singly-MSI interrupt systems. Hence removing MSI range support.
> This change will be useful for further cleanup in copy engine lock
> and to add NAPI support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajkumar Manoharan <[email protected]>

[...]

> @@ -171,14 +168,10 @@ struct ath10k_pci {
>       void __iomem *mem;
>       size_t mem_len;
>  
> -     /*
> -      * Number of MSI interrupts granted, 0 --> using legacy PCI line
> -      * interrupts.
> -      */
> -     int num_msi_intrs;
> +     /* Operating interrupt mode */
> +     u8 oper_irq_mode;

Shouldn't this be enum ath10k_pci_irq_mode?

-- 
Kalle Valo
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

Reply via email to