... and what's "TEC specification" ?

-
a


On 19 September 2016 at 09:28, Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com> wrote:
> Out of curiosity, does ath9k perform at the required rates in a similar
> setup?
>
> Sending tcp, udp, or some other protocol?  How are you generating the
> traffic?
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
>
>
> On 09/18/2016 09:26 PM, Sridhar Kondabathini wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>      When we are testing 802.11 a/g mode throughput measurements on
>> T1024RDB ( we used
>> kernel-3.12; ath10k drivers backported from 4.4;hostapd 2.5 for 11AC
>> support), then we
>> are getting 26-27 Mbps , which is not meeting the required TEC
>> specification (which is
>> ~28 Mbps). How can we increase the throughput in these modes.
>>
>>       Can you please help on this.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Sridhar Kondabathini,
>> Research engineer,
>> PSG lab,
>> Center for Development Of Telematics
>> 9480484821.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Disclaimer:
>> ----------
>> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
>> solely
>> for
>> the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.  If you
>> are not the
>> intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing
>> or taking
>> any
>> action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
>> prohibited. The
>> sender does not a
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ath10k mailing list
>> ath10k@lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
>>
>
>
> --
> Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com>
> Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ath10k mailing list
> ath10k@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

Reply via email to