Rajkumar Manoharan <rmano...@qti.qualcomm.com> writes: > Agree.. Even I am not fan of that patch in ath10k. IIRC Michal pushed > this change as temp one and planned to revert it once it is fixed in > stack or in driver. > > I thought Eric change in fq_codel is meant only for fatty udp flows. > Forgive my ignorance.
It is, mostly. There's a separate possible issue with TCP performance that we're looking into, but that is unrelated to TXQs. -Toke _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
