(Fixed Govind's top posting and adding Masahiro) >>> WCN3990 is integrated 802.11ac chipset with SNOC bus interface. Add >>> snoc layer driver registration and associated ops. >>> >>> WCN3990 support is not yet complete as cold-boot handshake is done >>> using qmi(Qualcomm-MSM-Interface) and qmi client support will be added >>> once qmi framework is available. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Govind Singh <govi...@codeaurora.org> >> >> Kbuild bot found an odd problem with this patch: >> >> include/linux/dynamic_debug.h:77:14: error: 'KBUILD_MODNAME' >> undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'KBUILD_BASENAME'? >> >> Full report: >> >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/ath10k/2018-February/010907.html >> >> Any ideas? Is this is some unrelated issue or what? This patch is not >> even touching hif.h or ce.c. > > I didn't encountered this issue as in my defconfig only > CONFIG_ATH10K_SNOC was defined. This problem is coming when we define > CONFIG_ATH10K_SNOC and CONFIG_ATH10K_PCI simultaneously in defconfig > and this is known issue when multiple modules share objects(in this > case ce.o). I saw similar reported problem and found > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10060825/. > > After picking the below change issue is not seen.
Let's ask the kbuild maintainer. Masahiro, any chances of getting this patch applied anytime soon: kbuild: define KBUILD_MODNAME even if multiple modules share objects https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10060825/ In ath10k we would need it as otherwise we are not able to link ce.o both to ath10k_pci.ko and ath10k_snoc.ko. What do you think? Full discussion and the ath10k patch here: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10220657/ -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k