Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottsch...@dd-wrt.com> writes: > i have some comments about your check warnings. > some of them are bogus. for instance they advise to use "unsigned int" > instead of "unsigned". this might be better, but > the original kernel header uses "unsigned" as api definition. so i > decided to use the same declarations here.
Sure, but using "unsigned int" won't create any harm either. > for the rest like whitespaces i will make a new version and remove them You missed my comment in my earlier mail that I'll send the next version. I have already fixed all the warnings so let me submit it. I'll do also some other changes. -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list email@example.com http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k