Adrian Chadd <[email protected]> writes: > On 23 April 2018 at 08:50, Kalle Valo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Adrian was also commenting something similar about adding a debugfs >> interface but I don't really see the point right now while we are adding >> initial wcn3990 support. If someone wants to run measurements with and >> without this parameter it's very easy to edit it out from the sources. >> Later on we can consider making it dynamic if there's really the need >> for that, but I'm very skeptic that anyone would even need that. > > Hi! > > We have at ${WORK}, because we've found various devices (atheros and > qualcomm and QCA and otherwise) have this nasty habit of trying to > guess when a good time to clock-gate down is, but we're busy doing low > latency audio/video. > > 10, 20ms may not be a lot of latency for bulk data but that's a half > to one of a video frame in my world. :-)
Sure, I get that. But we should discuss making a setting like this dynamic once we have a test case and numbers showing that it's needed, otherwise it's just unnecessary cruft. -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
