Rajkumar Manoharan <rmano...@codeaurora.org> writes:
> On 2018-09-29 03:06, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> Rajkumar Manoharan <rmano...@codeaurora.org> writes:
>>
>>> - ath10k_htt_tx_txq_update(hw, f_txq);
>>> + if (ret == -EBUSY) {
>>> + ieee80211_txq_schedule_start(hw, ac);
>>> + ieee80211_return_txq(hw, txq);
>>> + ieee80211_txq_schedule_end(hw, ac);
>>> + }
>>
>> And ieee80211_return_txq() should be called regardless of the return
>> code (it'll do it's own checking and do nothing if the queue is empty).
>>
> Yeah.. Seems like calling return_txq unconditionally is messing with
> may_transmit sequence. i.e pull mode.
Messing with, how?
-Toke
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
