Erik Stromdahl <erik.stromd...@gmail.com> writes: > On 4/1/19 1:05 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: >> Erik Stromdahl <erik.stromd...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> Iterating the TX queue and thereby dequeuing all available packets in the >>> queue could result in performance penalties on some SMP systems. >>> >>> The reason for this is most likely that the per-ac lock (active_txq_lock) >>> in mac80211 will be held by the CPU iterating the current queue. >>> >>> This will lock up other CPUs trying to push new messages on the TX >>> queue. >>> >>> Instead of iterating the queue we fetch just one packet at the time, >>> resulting in minimal starvation of the other CPUs. >> >> Did you test this with Felix' patches reducing the time the lock is held >> in mac80211? >> >> -Toke >> > Hi Toke, > > I am not aware of these patches. Can you please point them out for me?
They've already been merged. Commits dcec1d9bc8a7 and 7ef769459f14 in mac80211-next :) -Toke _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
